Introducing Semiotics outlines the development of sign study from its classical Through Paul Cobley’s text and Litza Jansz’s illustrations, this seminal. “Introducing Semiotics” outlines the development of sign study from its classical Through Paul Cobley’s incisive text and Litza Jansz’s brilliant. Buy Introducing Semiotics: A Graphic Guide by Paul Cobley, Litza Jansz (ISBN: ) from Amazon’s Book Store. Everyday low prices and free.

Author: Meztishura Kegore
Country: Turks & Caicos Islands
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Health and Food
Published (Last): 3 August 2005
Pages: 461
PDF File Size: 17.74 Mb
ePub File Size: 9.63 Mb
ISBN: 612-6-52783-384-4
Downloads: 68282
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Nesho

Introducing Semiotics (Paperback)

That being said, I did grasp a couple of key concepts more deeply, and the illustrated format lends itself particularly well to working through ideas about images, signs, and conflicting meaning in language.

Intersting book, especially because it is brief and the brevity leaves a lot unsaid!

This perennial question of philosophy is answered in the 20th century by the science of semiotics. To ask other readers questions about Introducing Semioticsplease sign up. Introducinf really enjoyed the topic but had a hard time fully grasping the concept. Open Preview See a Problem? I thought that the illustrations by Litza Jansz were helpful, particularly the charts and graphs.

Introducing Semiotics

The bits where it gave examples were great—it just needed more of those. Also, I’m sure that people who work in marketing, public relations and advertising should pay more attention to semiotic connections between things, signs, etc.


This was more about the psychology behind it as opposed to what specific symbols mean, but I preferred it that way. The term sign has many meanings in cibley contexts, but without checking methodically they are all discussed introduciing semiotics. Return to Book Page. Layouts and designs are attractive and engaging. In fact, semiotics’ impact on our daily lives is tangible and clbley of the examples used by Cobley are relatable.

Prior to reading this book, I thought I had a cursory, at bestknowledge of semiotics.

Introducing Semiotics: A Graphic Guide – Paul Cobley – Google Books

The drawings also allow your brain to take a breather before continuing on to the next concept. The author went through a lot of different theorists and broke down their ideas.

This series of graphic guides covers every key thinker and topic in philosophy, psychology, science, politics, religion, cultural studies, linguistics and more. Clever and light guide cob,ey well as a good start for the personal semiotic trip. No trivia or quizzes yet.

Thanks for telling us about the problem. His new book, Contemporary Semiotics Mouton de Gruyterwill be published in Through Paul Cobley’s incisive text introduicng Litza Jansz’s brilliant illustrations, it identifies the key semioticians and their work and explains the simple concepts behind difficult terms. However, I thought this was overall a very clear book. More reading needs to be done to get even a decent perspective, historically or in a modern sense. Now, as I was reading this book, I am taking a course on Reading and Language Development for a Post-Bac and a lot semiptics the content for that course tied into the concepts covered in this book.


My library Help Advanced Book Search. Account Options Sign in.

Introducing Semiotics outlines the development of sign study from its classical precursors to conte Why study signs? Of several reads on this broad topic, this is the best and ties in is connections with other disciplines.

This perennial question of philosophy is answered by the science of semiotics. However, some of the illustrations seemed racist. The topic is not “easy,” but the book is enormously helpful for someone who wants to begin reading the works of semiologists, but who needs some historical and theoretical context.

I didn’t know much about semiotics before, so I have no idea if the text itself is accurate. A glossary might have helped too. It does not critique semiotic theory beyond what one generati The structure it seems appropriate semiotixs begin with the structure is to examine proto-semiotics followed by early and unsophisticated semiotics i.

It fails to do two things, however.